Health
and social care management is constantly bombarded by conflicting philosophies
of care, whereby the needs of the patient are increasingly
important whilst balancing the books. Higher standards and
quality of care are expected as the resource allocations
in many cases are decreased. The spiral continues, placing
the health manager in the invidious position of the giver
and denier. The same is true in the social care field.
An
ever-increasing group, which will for the foreseeable future
be incrementally rising, are older people. Other groups,
which place a high demand on resources, are the disabled
and cognitively impaired. Each of these groups requires
quality care within constrained resources. Is there a technological
solution to this crisis?The
answer is Yes, possibly . The solution is the intervention
of smart home technology into this area. Smart home technology
uses common devices, such as movement sensors for
burglar alarms, to enable and empower individuals with physical
and/or cognitive disabilities. Devices such as door or window
openers are commonplace in offices and supermarkets, but
now have the ability to be used within the domestic residence.
The devices themselves are not the main features, although
they are intrinsic, as the way that these devices are networked
together is the central feature of a 'smart' home.
The
networking of devices allows more functionality to be given
to the device, so that a door opener can be connected with
the lighting circuit, such that when the door opens the
will be turned lights on automatically. All this is fairly
simple, and no longer seems futuristic. What is new is the
use of these devices in developing specified homes for individuals
with physical or mental impairments or the elderly who might
have degenerative conditions. Systems that are specifically
meeting the needs of the individual provide empowerment
and can add to the quality of life of an individual allowing
them to retain some measure of control over their environment.
Moreover, through smart home technology, individuals have
the possibility of living non-institutional based lives.
The possibilities are phenomenal, considering this technology
can be applied to people of age, the disabled and the cognitively
impaired. It could be used for degenerative conditions as
well as rehabilitation.
Although
this sounds hypothetical, smart technology is being currently
used in these areas. Within Scotland, a number of Health
Trusts and social work departments are using advanced environmental
control systems to facilitate individuals with disabilities.
There is a 'smart house' for a person who acquired a brain
injury, a smart home rehabilitation flat for people with
acquired brain injuries, and numerous other smaller localised
projects, which use some form of networking of devices.
The reality is smart home technology does have a critical
part to play in future health care initiatives if it is used correctly. Health
and social care managers should investigate this technology, as there are
potential savings by its use. Although the initial expenditure
can be perceived as fairly high, this should be seen as
a one-off payment as opposed to the cost of institutional
or community care packages. This does not mean that community
care packages will cease for patients who have their homes
adapted to smart home, care packages will still be required,
but the expenditure on each package will be able to be decreased
over time in many cases. Early intervention by proactive
health managers can also save money in the long term. An
example of this could be installing the minimal smart home
technology for a patient in the early stages of dementia,
to allow the informal carers and the patient to remain at
home for a considerably longer time. As the condition increases
in severity, more devices can be configured to enable the
patient to be cared for within the community with minimal
external intervention.
A
development in this field is a software package that
enables trained health workers to design complex smart homes
that could meet the needs of the stakeholders and
end users. The software is design to be run on a laptop
computer and allows the user of the tool (known as the Process
Facilitator) to design and configure highly complex networks
as a result of an assessment of the end user, discussions
with the main stakeholders (Health, Social and Housing related).
After these discussions the Process Facilitator (PF) is
able to draw up a provisional network design which is graphically
displayed in order to consult with the stakeholders and
end users to ensure that all needs are catered for. The
software also allows the PF to add the networking configurations
and settings to the proposed devices and provides a rough
cost estimate for the installation.The
usefulness of this tool is manifold. By its use the PF is
saving the stakeholders money as installers and engineers
will not be required until the installation has received
approval. Health managers are able to consider the option
of smart home technology and assess the cost compared to
other more conventional solutions. The PF acts as a mediator
between the differing interest groups to provide the best
solution for the patient considering the constraints that
might apply.
The
developers of this software are currently seeking health
care professionals who wish to train as Process Facilitators.
Training is crucial, as once the specification is agreed
the PF is solely responsible for the implementation and
appropriateness of the design. Furthermore, it is envisaged
that a network of PFs will exist throughout Europe who will
be facilitating the design of appropriate smart homes for
differing client groups with this software. Smart home technology
can be a cost effective and resource driven answer to better
quality care at no additional cost.
Guy
Dewsbury
Copyright
2000,
G.Dewsbury,
RGU;
CUSTODIAN,
TIDE DE4004